Tag Archives: Global Warming

Why the Left can’t fight terror: they don’t even understand it.

So John McCain (D, AZ) has once again added his unrequested two cents to the War on Terrorism. Now you probably thought he couldn’t have done more after campaigning for Obama in 2008 or taking pictures with members of Al-Qaeda just a few years ago. But he just came out and said that speaking against radical Islam will turn radical Muslims against us. Yeah, because a culture that has been attacking US interests for so long that they are actually the first overseas conflict we had to be engaged in, is only now hating us because we don’t like them.

 

John. Just shut up and go away. You’re not helping. You are never helping. Even on those rare occasions when you’re right, your very presence hurts the cause. Go away.

But don’t worry, liberals are picking up the slack on this. Leftist economists are saying that it’s inequality that is causing Muslims to turn to violence. The fact that most of the people who are radicalized in the West are well educated, middle and upper middle class men. Or the fact that head of ISIS has a Ph.D. and the Bid Laden family is filthy rich has no bearing on the fact that liberals like to blame everything on inequality. Inequality. For the left it causes everything. Slow economy? Inequality is to blame. Terrorism? Inequality is to blame. Massive Debt? Inequality is to blame. Bad acne is probably caused by inequality. There is pretty much nothing the left doesn’t blame inequality for…except maybe global warming….

 

Which, by the way, our dear idiot-in-chief thinks that global warming (not seen since the turn of the century) is to blame for terrorism. Despite the fact that even if global warming was even partly responsible for drought in the Middle East, it’s not like they weren’t rolling in money, had access to ports, and Israel as an example of how to efficiently desalinate sea water for agriculture. No, the refusal to actually deal with your problems in an intelligent fashion has nothing to do with culture and everything to do with the boogey man of global warming.

 

So do they hate us because we hate them? Because of inequality? Because of global warming? Do liberals even try to have any logical consistency in any of this?

Nope. They just want some kind of excuse where it is the fault of the West and no blame be put on the culture of death itself.

So what does cause them to hate us? Because let’s be honest here, it’s certainly not any of the liberal BS…they hated us before we questioned the long-term practicality of taking in Syrian refugees, they hated us before we invade Iraq, they were gathering support against Classical Liberalism before Israel was ever formed, hell the Barbary pirates were attacking the West before America even existed. If you think US actions in any way, shape, or form are the cause of radicalizing Muslim extremists, I would suggest you join the cult of the Anti-Semites that follow Ron and Rand Paul (they too would like to put blame on America for 9/11 and all other acts of terror).

So what is the cause?

111988_original.jpg

The desire to control all of this (and much more after that) is not caused by Global Warming, Inequality, US actions abroad or any other liberal drivel.  There are evil people out there.  They must be fought and their ideas must be fought. 

Well, I propose it comes down to three things, none of which on their own might be too difficult a problem to tolerate—but together they spell disaster.

The first is a culture of death and violence.
Judaism was founded on a single guy making a deal with God. Christianity on an act of sacrifice. Buddhism on a guy sitting under a tree. Hinduism’s roots are so far back it’s hard to nail then down but it’s a religion based on meditation so…meanwhile when you have a religion that started with “hey, let’s rob from and then kill people we don’t like, and oh, those Jews that didn’t want to back us in our acts of theft and murder, they can all die too.” Amazing that when you’re a child raping, genocidal lunatic writeing down the voices in his head he mistakes for God you get a religion not exactly grounded in love and compassion. Every religion has it’s dark points, every religion has it’s prophets that were crazier than others….but when your religion has only one prophet and he a bloodthirsty nut job obsessed with conquest, there aren’t exactly any countering voices in scriptures to offer any balance.
And lo-and-behold this leads to a culture a little more open to violence as a method of conflict resolution…and not just as an option of last resort, but more of an opening gambit.
You can whine all you want about the myth that it’s a religion of peace, but the fact is that, Islam praises violence over and over again in the Koran, unlike every other religion on Earth it does not grant intrinsic value and divinity to the human soul, and also unlike every other religion it actively denies reason. And being that static encourages them to never evolve or improve themselves as people or as a culture. And worse the ethics implicit in this culture are ones that lead to not just tyranny but a fascist form of tyranny.

Does this mean that most people in the Muslim world are violent? Nope. Like most people in the rest of the world earning enough to put food on the table for the family is a far more important factor than religion. But ideas have consequences. And the ideas of Islam, especially modern Asharaite Sunni Islam, have serious consequences.

The second reason is that teenagers are stupid.
You’ll notice that most of these people are young or get started in these ideas when they’re young. Probably because, biologically, your brain is not developed until you’re about 26 and you’re fairly brain damaged until that development stops. Just spend some time with teenagers—In any culture they’re morons, most of the time lovable little bastards, but morons nonetheless. Some are ahead of the curve, most are not horrifically stupid, but as a group not the exactly the group known for long-term thinking. From the Hitler Youth to stupid teenagers in the ’60’s adopting various forms of violence in the U.S., to the Occupy scum, to idiot young people going to join ISIS, teenagers are morons, and statistically some of them will do incredibly violent things because they’re stupid. Ideally your culture allows outlets for these morons to be morons that are at least less destructive (like college or joining some hippie commune)…but as we’ve seen you can be raised in a culture that doesn’t glorify violence and young people will still be stupid enough to seek it out. Granted it’s not only young people attracted to this kind of stupidity (see Jonestown) but youth had the predominance of morons out there.

 

And because they’re stupid they do hate us for our liberties. Because if there is one thing that kind of stupid is looking for it’s a simple, plain, easy explanation of the universe, the world and life. Liberty offers none of that. Liberty comes with chaos…and worst of all personal responsibility. The idiocy of youth hates those things, they like black and white stability and the will lash out against anything that jeopardizes it (doesn’t matter if their lashing out leads to more chaos than liberty could ever produce, that understanding is exactly the kind of long term thinking they’re not capable of.)

Okay so let’s be honest there is pretty much nothing we can do about these first two points. History isn’t going to change, and biological facts are also pretty stable.

So let’s look to the third reason.
As I suggested before you want your culture to have alternative voices. And ever since the pro-reason Mu’tazalite Muslims were slaughtered about 800 years ago there haven’t been many pro-reason Muslim groups…individual yes, movements not so much. So we need to stop that. We need to stop looking for “moderates” and start looking for people who actually want to reform this religion and bring it out of the sixth century, that position is fairly radical and would never be considered moderate.

Honestly when we were in a conflict with those radical Germans back in the 1940’s did we reach out to the moderates at the time, those self proclaimed “Good Germans” who had an amazing ability to not know what was going on right in front of their faces…no I’m pretty sure we first reached out to German underground and looked for intel and ways to put high explosives and Der Fuhrer in the same room.

But there are real reformists…a few at least…

…and we should support these people and make sure they have the means to get their message out to the entire Muslim world. We need to dig out those old Arabic translations of Plato and Aristotle (and update them with Farsi, Pashto and every other major language of the era) and see a rebirth of Mu’tazalite ideas that once created the golden age of Islamic civilization).

And we need to do this because while we, should and must kill the ones who have already embraced the evil of terrorism, you’re not going to stem the problem until you start attacking the ideas.

Leave a comment

Filed under Foreign Policy, Uncategorized, War on Terrorism

Global Warming Facts…

And by facts I mean scientific studies that show, maybe the hype about global warming and climate change is a bit over done.  The end is not near, mankind is not killing the planet, the world will keep turning and climate will keep changing as it always has with or without humans.

P. Chylek, et al. 2004″Global warming and the Greenland ice sheet,” Climate Change 63, 201-21. “Since 1940… data have undergone predominantly a cooling trend…. The Greenland ice sheet and coastal regions are not following the current global warming trend.”

Doran, P. T., Priscu, J. C., Lyons, W. B., Walsh, … and Parsons, A. N., 2002, “Antarctic climate cooling and terrestrial ecosystem response,” Nature 415: 517-20.
From 1986 to 2000 central Antarctic valleys cooled .7 degrees Celsius per decade with serious ecosystem damage from cold.

Comiso, J. C., 2000, “Variability and trends in Antarctic surface temperatures from in situ and satellite infrared measurements,”Journal of Climate 13: 1674-96.
Both satellite data and ground stations show slight cooling over the last 20 years.

Joughin, I., and Tulaczyk, S., 2002, “Positive mass balance of the Ross Ice Streams, West Antarctica,” Science 295: 476-80.
Side-looking radar measurements show West Antarctic ice is increasing at 26.8 gigatons/yr. Reversing the melting trend of the last 6,000 years.

Thompson, D. W. J., and Solomon, S., 2002, “Interpretation of recent Southern Hemisphere climate change,” Science 296: 895-99.
Antarctic peninsula has warmed several degrees while interior has cooled somewhat. Ice shelves have retreated but sea ice has increased.

Petit, J. R., Jouzel, J., Raynaud, D., Barkov, N. L., … and Stievenard, M., 1999, “Climate and atmospheric history of the past 420,000 years from the Vostok ice core, Antarctica,”Nature 399: 429-36.
During the last four interglacials, going back 420,000 years, the Earth was warmer that it is today.

Anderson, J. B., and Andrews, J. T., 1999, “Radiocarbon constraints on ice sheet advance and retreat in the Weddell Sea, Antarctica,” Geology 27: 179-82.
Less Antarctic ice has melted today than occurred during the last interglacial.

Liu, J., Curry, J. A., and Martinson, D. G., 2004, “Interpretation of recent Antarctic sea ice variability,” Geophysical Research Letters 31: 10.1029/2003 GLO18732.
Antarctic sea ice has increased since 1979.

Vyas, N. K., Dash, M. K., Bhandari, S. M., Khare, N., Mitra, A., and Pandey, P. C., 2003, “On the secular trends in sea ice extent over the antarctic region based on OCEANSAT-1 MSMR observations,” International Journal of Remote Sensing, 24: 2277-87.
Trend toward more sea ice may be accelerating.

Parkinson, C. L., 2002, “Trends in the length of the souther Ocean sea-ice season, 1979-99,” Annals of Glaciology 34: 435-40.
The greater part of Antarctica experiences a longer sea-ice season, lasting 21 days longer than it did in 1979.

Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2001, p. 774: “In climate research and modeling, we should recognize that we are dealing with a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore that the long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible.”

Same as above. Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change, p. 330. “Natural climate variability on long time-scales will continue to be problematic for CO2 climate change analysis and detection.”

C. Landsea, et al., 2000, “How much skill was there in forecasting the very strong 1997-1998 El Nino?” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 81: 2107-19. “… one could have even less confidence in anthropogenic global warming studies because of the lack of skill in predicting El Nino… the successes of ENSO forecasting have been overstated (sometimes drastically) and misapplied it in other arenas.”

Fred Pearce, “Africans go back to the land as plants reclaim the desert,” New Scientist 175, 21 September 20021 pp. 4-5. “Africa’s deserts are in retreat… Analysis of satellite images… reveals that dunes are retreating right across the Sahel region… Vegetation is ousting sand across a swathe of land stretching… 6,000 kilometers… Analysts say the gradual greening has been happening since the mid 1980’s, though has gone largely unnoticed.”

Paul Reiter, et al, “Global warming and malaria: a call for accuracy,” Lancet, 4, no. 1 (June 2004).”Many of these much-publicized predictions are ill informed and misleading.”

Roger J. Braithwaite, “Glacier mass balance, the first 50 years of international monitoring,” Progress in Physical Geography 26 no. 1 (2002): 76-95. “There is no obvious common global trend of increasing glacier melt in recent years.”

The fallowing quotations is from the IPCC.
According to the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, “Examination of meteorological data fails to support the perception [of increased frequency and severity of extreme climate events] in the context of long term climate change.”
“Overall, there is no evidence that extreme weather events, or climate variability, has increased, in a global sense, throughout the twentieth century…”
“No long term trend events” for tropical and extratropical storms, and no systematic changes in the “frequency of tornadoes, thunder days, or hail.”

Nature 22 (October 2003):395-741, stated that, with Russia signed on, temperature affected by Kyoto would be -.02 degrees Celsius by 2050.
IPCC models estimate more but none exceed .15 degrees Celsius.

Thank you Dr. M. Crichton for compiling this list.

2 Comments

Filed under Environmentalism

What Obama calls the Flat Earth Society I call facts

I could go on and on personally, but why listen to me…here are some facts about “Global Warming”

Global Warming Alarmists Caught Doctoring ’97-Percent Consensus’ Claims–Forbes.  apparently there isn’t as much consensus as Obama would like you to believe.  (This one is fun because it has a who’s who of scientists who think this Global Warming hysteria is ridiculous).
A cooling consensus–The Economist. What warming there was, which really wasn’t a lot, has been slowly in defiance of the fanatics.
A Cure Worse Than the Disease: Global Economic Impact of Global Warming Policy–Heritage.  Though the title speaks for itself it needs to be reiterated that destroying capitalism would be worse than even the most dire predictions of these chicken littles.
Global Warming and Global Food Security–Cato.  On what whiny chiken littles these Global Warming prophets of doom are.
Hurricane Sandy: Not the Global Warming Bombshell It’s Cracked Up to Be–Heritage.  The weather disasters blamed on Global Warming really have little if anything to do with it.

In Defense of Carbon Dioxide–WSJ Even more scientists attacking this hysteria.

Tree ring studies confirm global COOLING–a summary of an much longer study here.

Global_Cooling_11

Al Gore’s ‘nine Inconvenient Untruths’–Telegraph. The holy grail of Global Warming is apparently based on a bunch of lies..and the lies were the best they could do.
To The Horror Of Global Warming Alarmists, Global Cooling Is Here–Forbes.  Going over the fact that climate change is kind of a basic fact of the globe historically.  It happened a lot before humans were burning fossil fuels, it will continue to happen at odd and unpredictable times…humans have little to do with it.
Mars Melt Hints at Solar, Not Human, Cause for Warming, Scientist Says–National Geographic. Gee, there are climate changes on Mars that mirror the changes on the Earth.  Hmm…I guess fossil fuels are so bad that they’re effecting other planets!  Oh, wait, maybe it’s the sun.

A few thoughts on Global Warming...

Look climate is never stable.  Never has been, never will be.  Has temperature gone up in the last century.  Yeah.  But no factual link between humans has been found.  Are humans to blame for some of it…certainly on a limited scale, because we’re covering the areas we live in heat conducting asphalt, amazing then that these areas of high population density are warmer than they were previously.

Let me just ask you this…the hysteria wing has been promising that the Earth will burn and the sea will rise for over 30 years…and honestly, everything pretty much looks the same as it did 30 years ago.  So where is the proof?

Also if environmentalists are so concerned, why are they not pushing for more nuclear energy? It’s cleaner, cheaper and more efficient.  If we replaced all production with nuclear energy you would not only radically reduce the amount of CO2 released but lower the cost of energy and free up massive amounts of money that could go into research for more efficient solar cells and batteries for electric cars…but strangely they don’t want that.  Why?

Leave a comment

Filed under Capitalism, Environmentalism, Evils of Liberalism, Government is useless, politics